Honest comparison
H7 vs Falco vs commercial eBPF EDR
H7 is not an EDR replacement. It is a behavioral attestation engine — designed specifically for autonomous AI agents in regulated environments. The table below is grounded in what each tool actually does at the implementation level.
Notes on the comparison
Falco
Falco is an excellent open-source runtime security tool for generic Linux workloads. It matches against a ruleset of individual syscall patterns. It does not build behavioral baselines, does not produce cryptographically signed forensic artifacts, and has no concept of AI agent namespaces. Its alert output is not structured as regulatory evidence.
Commercial eBPF EDR
Commercial eBPF-based EDR tools (e.g. Tetragon, Aqua Runtime, Sysdig Secure) provide broad workload security with auto-remediation. They are built for cloud-native generic workloads and SOC workflows. They do not produce offline-verifiable cryptographic attestation artifacts, and their evidence format is not structured to satisfy DORA Art. 17 field-by-field requirements for AI agent incidents.
Auto-isolation
H7 deliberately does not auto-isolate agents. Automated kill switches in production AI systems introduce their own risk surface. DORA requires documented human decision-making in incident response. H7 emits a signed alert and certificate — the operator initiates containment.
See it for yourself
Run the H7 demo kit and compare the detection output to any alternative in 10 minutes.